August 14, 2017

     The Connecticut Democrats have rubber stamped a deal for public sector unions that will not only require massive tax increases in three years, but require significant increases now. Independent budget analyses reveal that even with the so-called public sector concessions; Connecticut’s budget is $3.5 billion in the hole over the next two years. Increasing the sales tax, legalizing marijuana, building another casino and increasing licensing fees will still leave a deficit of $1.0 billion, if not more. The reflexive liberal solution to “tax the rich” with higher income and estate taxes has been tried and has actually decreased revenue. The wealthy, the productive, the retired and the young are abandoning our beautiful state in droves. Thus, in the political corridors of power, tolls are seen as inevitable.

     This will be a disaster. Because of improved technology, tolls are much easier to collect. No traffic-congesting toll booth is necessary. All that is needed is a structure over a road that detects what are called transponders, an apparatus that is placed on the windshield that sends the toll due to an interstate collecting bureaucracy called E-ZPass. A bill is then sent to the driver. Most drivers now have E-ZPass but for those who do not, a picture of the license plate is taken and a bill is sent to the car’s owner. If you think that Connecticut bureaucrats have it made now with their fat salaries, six-figure pensions and Cadillac health insurance; wait until this confiscatory gold mine is foisted on the taxpayers.

     Most states institute tolls with the goal of achieving 4 cents per mile from drivers. Not in the Peoples Republic of Connecticut. According to plans already drawn up by the Connecticut Department of Transportation (DOT), the goal will be 10 to 20 cents per mile. Do the math and assume 15 cents a mile. If you drive 10,000 miles a year, that’s 1,500 smackers. And once the liberals and unions see the cash coming in, get ready to be further hosed with escalating rates. Free health care, free daycare, free college tuition along with more bureaucratic sinecures with six-figure pensions will be on the agenda. And don’t think you can avoid these tolls by taking alternate routes. The State DOT intends to put these tolls on side roads too, not just major arteries. Remember, all you need is a structure over the road.

     You may be thinking that at least everyone has to pay. Don’t bet on it. What happens if you don’t have E-ZPass and drop your toll bill in the circular file? Basically nothing. Yes, the state may make you pay your bill when you re-register your car, but what if you don’t bother? Many states with tolls don’t try to collect this money and have no mechanism for sending the bill to a collection agency.

     Now you are undoubtedly consoling yourself with the thought the political hacks that foisted this literal highway robbery on you will also have to pay it themselves. Au contraire! The politically-connected will be issued what are called “non-revenue transponders,” just like in another Democratic stronghold, Massachusetts. As the reader may have guessed, these political hacks get to drive around exempt from the tolls – just like the politicians who gave us Obamacare are exempted from it. The political class knows how to protect themselves.

     Some of my otherwise sane fiscally-conservative friends like the idea of tolls, arguing that they have to pay them in other states while citizens from these states get a free ride in Connecticut. This makes no sense. Just because other states are ripping you off, why do you want to be ripped off in your home state too? These same friends also believe the money coming in from the tolls will repair our roads and bridges because the politicians will put the receipts in a “lock box” and only use the money for infrastructure repair. If you believe this, I will gladly sell you the Statue of Liberty for a mere $1,000. Some argue that at least tolls will stabilize Connecticut’s finances. But once the Democrats control a political bailiwick, the finances are never stabilized as their base wants more and more and more.

     So don’t believe any of the promises of our politicians and their acolytes in the liberal media when they extol the wonders of tolls. More money will be extracted from your pocket, and you will get nothing in return. That is unless you are one of the many public retirees who flee the state to avoid the taxes and tolls that are bankrolling your pension and health care.

 

 

July 31, 2017

 

     The American president has one job: to prevent the detonation of nuclear weapons. Everything else – the economy, the Supreme Court, the environment, Obamacare, the Russian scandal du jour etc. – is irrelevant. Thus, President Trump has three issues he must address:  the first is North Korea, the second is North Korea and the third is North Korea.

     With the successful launching of two ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missiles), North Korea is now poised to have the technology to hit the American mainland with a nuclear warhead within two years.  President Trump has three options: allow North Korea to develop a nuclear-armed ICBM, continue to use diplomacy or a military strike.

     Allow North Korea to develop a nuclear-armed ICBM. It may well be that if North Korea develops a nuclear-armed ICBM; they will feel secure and not threaten to use it. Launching a missile at the United States would unleash a response that incinerates their country. But the more likely scenario is that North Korea will employ nuclear blackmail and demand we remove our 28,000 troops that occupy the demilitarized zone between North and South Korea. Our thriving capitalist ally, South Korea, would be immediately conquered and become the Communist cesspool of misery, starvation, gulags and mass murder that now characterize North Korea. Will President Trump and our military leaders risk a nuclear exchange to protect South Korea? Will the American people support such action? Who knows?

    Continue Diplomacy. The conventional wisdom is that we should channel our diplomacy to force China, North Korea’s protector, to goad them into stopping their nuclear program while placing further sanctions on North Korea and China itself. But three previous administrations have failed with this approach. One of President Trump’s first diplomatic efforts was to fete the Chinese President, Xi Jinping, at his mansion in Mar-a- Lago. This was perfectly reasonable, but it was unsuccessful. Not only did the Chinese make no attempt to stop North Korea, they supplied them with the mobile missile launchers that render it impossible for us to target nuclear-armed ICBMs.

     The Trump administration has responded with increased military exercises near North Korea, allowing Taiwan $1.5 billion in new weapons and urging South Korea to deploy the THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) missile defense system. While this has irritated the Chinese, no action has been taken to stop North Korea. Further sanctions such as not allowing Chinese students to study in the United States, tying up Chinese banks, launching a trade war or disallowing wealthy Chinese to purchase American property are options ; but are unlikely to change Chinese behavior.

     A Military Strike. President Trump could launch a military strike against North Korea with the goal of regime change or a more limited surgical strike that destroys the facilities that manufacture nuclear weapons. Unfortunately, North Korea could launch a missile attack at Seoul, South Korea’s capital, which would kill millions. Furthermore, how would China react? This could conceivably start World War III and return the planet to the Dark Ages.

     Recently, General Mark Milley, the U.S. Army chief of staff stated, “time is running out” for a diplomatic solution. General Joe Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was more blunt, stating: “What is unimaginable to me is allowing the capability to allow nuclear weapons [from North Korea] to land in Denver, Colorado. My job will be to develop military options to make sure that doesn’t happen.”

     Thus, the Trump administration may be leaning towards military action or at least towards threatening it – to increase diplomatic leverage. We can no longer kick the can down the street. One thing is for sure. Should President Trump decide on military force, all other issues will quickly become irrelevant, as the entire planet focuses on how the Chinese will respond.

 

 

June 25, 2017

 

The political battle lines over globalism have created an unpredictable electoral climate that is perplexing the Ruling Class of the Western world. Fault lines have developed, with the Ruling Class outraged that the masses will not listen to their betters and vote accordingly. Thus, we have Ruling Class outrage over the Brexit vote in England and the victory of President Trump.

Whether this disconnect can be bridged remains to be seen, but an explanation is in order so that both sides can at least understand the opposing viewpoint. For centuries, the Ruling Class has travelled aboard and seen unmitigated misery in the Third World – starvation, torture, ignorance and endless unnecessary deaths. While colonialism has existed since humans walked erect, it was the English and to a lesser extent other European powers, who first viewed their hegemony as not simply a mandate to plunder, but as an opportunity to better the lives of those they had conquered.

Thus, European conquerors required those governing their colonies to learn the customs and language of its subjects. It worked. Many colonies saw huge strides in education, food production, road construction, energy efficiency and representative governance. But there was a problem. Those conquered were humiliated and outraged. The human brain is programmed to prefer poor governance from its own kind rather that competent governance from outsiders. As rebellions mounted, colonialism ended. Countries that tolerated colonialism longer were more likely to have intact democratic and economic institutions. Thus Barbados, Bermuda and India are thriving. Haiti, the only successful slave revolt in history, is a disaster.

Thus, the Western Ruling Class came up with a new model – propping up dictatorships. By this time, American hegemony had been established and we proceeded to put puppet governments in countries that could not quickly convert to democracy. The Shah of Iran was a classic example, put in power by the American CIA in 1953. Again, this model worked. Iran was prospering with vast economic improvements over a short period of time. But the same problem arose. The Shah was correctly perceived by Iranians as an American puppet and overthrown. Now Iran is a theocracy.

The Ruling Class pivoted again, advocating free trade and open borders so that the poor in the Third World could not only have better jobs, but could move and live in Western countries.  This worked too. Workers in China and India saw rapid increases in wages while those who managed to immigrate to the Western world – whether legally or illegally – realized a rapid improvement in their standard of living. But now a new problem emerged. The middle class of the West saw their wages stagnate as they were forced to compete with both immigrants and workers in other countries.

This is why America’s Ruling Class awoke November 9 and collectively put its hands on its cheeks like the individual portrayed in Edvard Munch’s iconic portrait The Scream. Donald Trump was now President.

What model will emerge from this? Who knows? If the Ruling Class can successfully negate President Trump’s election, as it is working overtime to do, globalism may return with some modifications to placate the middle class. But if Trump persists, a new economic nationalism may emerge where America and Europeans pursue their own interests and leave other countries to their own devices. Can this model work in the Nuclear Era? Stay tuned.